| |||||||
| PlanetCricket.net | Register | Rules | Members | vBookie | Arcade | Casino | Journals | Mark Forums Read | |||
| PlanetCricket Forums | Brian Lara Cricket Online | Cricket 07 .net | Cricket 2005 .org | Fantasy Cricket | More... | ||||||
| Other Stuff Everything non-cricket related goes here |
| View Poll Results: Which of these is your favorite cricket game | |||
| | 0 | 0% | |
| Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll | |||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| ICC Board Member AKA: Andrew (never Andy) Member Since: Oct 2004 Location: Huddersfield, Englan National Team: England Domestic Team: Lancashire | Just recent games only here
__________________ Visit Beyond The Boundary for non-test news and comments. Check out the CricketEurope Bermuda and Worldwide sections which I edit. They're associates, not minnows!! |
| |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| ICC Board Member AKA: Andrew (never Andy) Member Since: Oct 2004 Location: Huddersfield, Englan National Team: England Domestic Team: Lancashire | Micheal Vaughns cricket Manager had a lot of potential but was full of bugs, and had a completely unrealsitic transfer system. I had a county team with no England players in at one point. The sequel should be better. ICC (International Cricket Captain) is by far the greatest cricket game ever. It's a management game, so no fancy graphics, but you can really get into it. Best of all, it actually produces realistic results.
__________________ Visit Beyond The Boundary for non-test news and comments. Check out the CricketEurope Bermuda and Worldwide sections which I edit. They're associates, not minnows!! |
| |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| ICC Board Member AKA: Andrew (never Andy) Member Since: Oct 2004 Location: Huddersfield, Englan National Team: England Domestic Team: Lancashire | You select the team, decide who bowls, the batting order, the tatics, etc. You just don't play the actual game in thje same way as an arcade game. Management games are more common for soccer, eg. Championship Manager.
__________________ Visit Beyond The Boundary for non-test news and comments. Check out the CricketEurope Bermuda and Worldwide sections which I edit. They're associates, not minnows!! |
| |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| School Boy Cricketer Member Since: Dec 2003 | I think michel vaughn and cricket captain are better than cricket 2002 because that games r really realistic and lots of fun to play.Cricket captain was was favariate game though. :
__________________ <span style='font-size:8pt;line-height:100%'> http://www.cricketgaming.com/portal/cglogo.gif http://www.CricketGaming.com</span> -- For All Your Cricket Gaming Needs..... |
| |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Guest | Andrew, I think the games must be classified as arcade and strategy. I like both Cricket2002 and ICC. Cricket2002 because you play the game and ICC because it is reality. As a captain you decide what to do but it is in the hands of the players ( here, computer ) how it is done. |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Guest | In arcade games like cricket2002, we actually play the game. You choose the shot, you time it and stuff. In strategy games, you just tell the nowler where to bowl , say good length, short, etc, but the bowler can bowl it anywhere. It depends on how much he has settled, his stamina, and current form.ie. if he is outta form and you want him to bowl good length on the off stump, he would send one short and wide of off and the other full on the legs. These games are much real. |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |