addition of new rules in modern cricket

newzolt · 24th March 2006, 08:48 PM

Maybe these factors can be added:
Rain affected matches should follow D/L method.
New addition of power plays.
One bouncer per over.
Inclusion of Hawkeye technology.
3rd umpire for catches.

gaurav_indian · 24th March 2006, 08:55 PM

Don't you think you should put this in the thread Next EA Cricket Game?
Cricket 07

duffarama · 25th March 2006, 05:29 AM

Yes, I agree. I think we shouldn't create threads for invidual ideas from now on.
I'm leaving this thread open so the topic can be discussed however.

newzolt · 26th March 2006, 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gaurav_indian

Don't you think you should put this in the thread Next EA Cricket Game?
Cricket 07

But these ideas are for any cricket game in general.More so i had made this remark keeping in mind future editions of icc if at all they are published.
However they are applicable to all cricket games.

IanG · 24th May 2006, 01:17 AM

Maybe it's been introduces in later versions but the cricket games I have you don't get the run for a no ball if you score off that ball. Midn you it's Cricket 96 and Cricket 97 Ashes Tour Edition that I have

usy · 30th May 2006, 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by newzolt

But these ideas are for any cricket game in general.More so i had made this remark keeping in mind future editions of icc if at all they are published.
However they are applicable to all cricket games.

Hawkeye was in BLIC and surely will be in next version.

cricket doctor · 30th May 2006, 07:22 PM

I'm against Hawekye technology for some reason. Most of the time it only creates doubt.There's no way it can predict correctly where the ball is heading.

manee · 30th May 2006, 07:23 PM

Yeah Brian Lara uses it poorly because it starts the line of offstump in the middle off off instead of the absolute edge AND it predicts movement even if the ball hadnt pitched

puddleduck · 30th May 2006, 07:43 PM

Hawkeye is just a visual aid for fans watching the game to get an idea as to what the ball might or might not have done after it hit the pad. Nothing wrong with it in my opinion, although it does seem to have bred a fair amount of unfair criticism of umpires.

banana man · 5th June 2006, 05:27 PM

whatever happened to the good old days (not that i was around then) where the umpire did everything with out technology.

PlanetCricket.net	Register	Rules	Members	vBookie	Arcade	Casino	Journals	Mark Forums Read
PlanetCricket Forums		Brian Lara Cricket Online			Cricket 07 .net		Cricket 2005 .org		Fantasy Cricket		More...

24th March 2006, 08:48 PM	#1 (permalink)
newzolt International Cricketer Member Since: Oct 2005 Location: Mumbai National Team: India Domestic Team: Mumbai,Warwickshire,New South Wales	addition of new rules in modern cricket Maybe these factors can be added: Rain affected matches should follow D/L method. New addition of power plays. One bouncer per over. Inclusion of Hawkeye technology. 3rd umpire for catches. __________________ Last edited by newzolt; 24th March 2006 at 08:51 PM.

24th March 2006, 08:55 PM	#2 (permalink)
gaurav_indian Panel of Selectors Member Since: Aug 2005	Don't you think you should put this in the thread Next EA Cricket Game? Cricket 07 __________________ http://img357.imageshack.us/img357/9242/lp2copyac2.gif Last edited by gaurav_indian; 24th March 2006 at 09:09 PM.

25th March 2006, 05:29 AM	#3 (permalink)
duffarama ICC Chairman AKA: duffarama Member Since: Dec 2003 Location: Ste's Trenchcoat National Team: Victoria Domestic Team: Australia	Yes, I agree. I think we shouldn't create threads for invidual ideas from now on. I'm leaving this thread open so the topic can be discussed however. __________________

30th May 2006, 07:22 PM	#7 (permalink)
cricket doctor International Coach Member Since: Oct 2005 Location: Doesn't matter	I'm against Hawekye technology for some reason. Most of the time it only creates doubt.There's no way it can predict correctly where the ball is heading. __________________ I hope cricket doctor (CD) will be remembered. cricket doctor (CD), (October 2005 to December 2006)

24th May 2006, 01:17 AM	#5 (permalink)
IanG 2nd XI Cricketer Member Since: May 2006 Location: Newcastle Australia National Team: Australia Domestic Team: NSW Blues	Maybe it's been introduces in later versions but the cricket games I have you don't get the run for a no ball if you score off that ball. Midn you it's Cricket 96 and Cricket 97 Ashes Tour Edition that I have

30th May 2006, 07:23 PM	#8 (permalink)
manee Staff Member PC Awards 2008: Best Cricket Chat Poster Member Since: Jul 2005 Location: England National Team: India	Yeah Brian Lara uses it poorly because it starts the line of offstump in the middle off off instead of the absolute edge AND it predicts movement even if the ball hadnt pitched __________________ Infractions for poor grammer Yes, I know

30th May 2006, 07:43 PM	#9 (permalink)
puddleduck Chairman of Selectors AKA: Jeremy Member Since: Aug 2005 Location: Uk National Team: England Domestic Team: Middlesex	Hawkeye is just a visual aid for fans watching the game to get an idea as to what the ball might or might not have done after it hit the pad. Nothing wrong with it in my opinion, although it does seem to have bred a fair amount of unfair criticism of umpires.

5th June 2006, 05:27 PM	#10 (permalink)
banana man 2nd XI Cricketer Member Since: Apr 2006 Location: Paignton, Devon National Team: England Domestic Team: Northamptonshire	whatever happened to the good old days (not that i was around then) where the umpire did everything with out technology. __________________ Stifmeister's palace of love... uh, straight love.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)